MVME162-532系統模塊卡件
然而，明確禁止分銷(xiāo)或銷(xiāo)售由博士和博士開(kāi)發(fā)的相關(guān)材料以及先前版本的利潤易貨或貿易。用戶(hù)資格可由其醫療或康復專(zhuān)業(yè)人員和其他熟悉個(gè)人的指定觀(guān)察員完成?；加袊乐卣J知障礙的人不應接受。在進(jìn)行評級之前，專(zhuān)業(yè)人員應審查本手冊中提供的評級指南。擁有或其的人員在進(jìn)行評級之前，應讓一名熟悉的專(zhuān)業(yè)人員與他們一起審查評級指南，并讓他們回答在完成盤(pán)點(diǎn)過(guò)程中可能出現的任何問(wèn)題。目前，我們建議擁有的人和他們的作為員工完成相同版本的。在臨床實(shí)踐中，患者及其的工作人員的獨立評分之間的比較可以提供關(guān)于這些評分者群體的不同觀(guān)點(diǎn)的信息。檢查和討論這些不同的觀(guān)點(diǎn)對于有效的康復計劃以及揭示更微妙的問(wèn)題領(lǐng)域通常至關(guān)重要。的評分和解釋需要專(zhuān)業(yè)培訓和經(jīng)驗。理想情況下，使用進(jìn)行臨床評估的臨床團隊將獲得在測試和測量方面受過(guò)高級培訓的專(zhuān)業(yè)人員。當用于項目評估或研究時(shí)，此類(lèi)熟練的心理測量師也應參與其中。臨床環(huán)境中的專(zhuān)業(yè)人員對的解釋除了測試和測量的基本知識外，還需要對儀器和的具體經(jīng)驗。管理和評分填寫(xiě)如果要由多名評分員填寫(xiě)清單，則及其的工作人員應使用的單獨表格。工作人員可以使用一種表格以協(xié)商一致的方式完成清單。工作人員的協(xié)商一致評估結果是最可靠和準確的評估。如果只有一名員工完成了，建議咨詢(xún)已經(jīng)評估或治療過(guò)患者的其他員工。要完成，首先在第一頁(yè)的頂部放置人員的姓名。還提供了一個(gè)診所號碼或其他號碼的空間，該號碼將患者與設施特定的其他信息聯(lián)系起來(lái)。列出庫存日期，并圈出或填寫(xiě)完成庫存的人員。然后給每個(gè)項目打分。表格中提供了幫助進(jìn)行單項評分的簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明。單項評分指南的前項表示后的當前狀態(tài)或結果。分析表明，這個(gè)項目所代表的單一維度具有內部一致性。其他分析表明，這一主要維度包括代表能力活動(dòng)和社會(huì )參與的三個(gè)區域。在三個(gè)分量表指數中確定了對每個(gè)區域有貢獻的項目。主要用于代表的后遺癥。的前項應反映被評定者的當前狀態(tài)，無(wú)論是否有腦損傷以外的情況導致能力活動(dòng)或參與受限。這是因為，如果不是不可能的話(huà)，要確定哪些因素腦損傷其他因素是導致目前狀況的原因，通常是非常困難的。如果存在其他預先存在或共存的條件，導致前項中的限制，這些條件將在清單第項中確定。如果需要藥物治療以實(shí)現正?；蚪咏５墓δ?，則通過(guò)將該項目評級為級來(lái)反映。例如，如果使用興奮劑藥物消除了注意力問(wèn)題，則該人將在第項中被評為。
However, the distribution or sale of related materials developed by Dr. and Dr. and profit barter or trading of previous versions are expressly prohibited. The user qualification can be completed by its medical or rehabilitation professionals and other designated observers who are familiar with individuals. People with severe cognitive impairment should not accept it. Before rating, professionals should review the rating guidelines provided in this manual. Before rating, the owner or his/her staff should have a familiar professional review the rating guide with them and ask them to answer any questions that may arise during the completion of the inventory. At present, we recommend that the owner and their employees complete the same version of. In clinical practice, the comparison between the independent scores of patients and their staff can provide information about the different views of these rater groups. Examining and discussing these different perspectives is often critical for effective rehabilitation planning and for uncovering more subtle problem areas. Professional training and experience are required to score and explain. Ideally, clinical teams that use clinical assessments will have highly trained professionals in testing and measurement. When used for project evaluation or research, such skilled psychometrists should also be involved. In addition to the basic knowledge of testing and measurement, professionals in the clinical environment also need specific experience of instruments and. Management and Scoring Filling In If the list is to be filled in by more than one rater, a separate form should be used by his or her staff. Staff can use a form to complete the list by consensus. The consensus assessment result of the staff is the most reliable and accurate assessment. If only one employee has completed it, it is recommended to consult with other employees who have evaluated or treated patients. To complete, first place the name of the person at the top of the first page. It also provides a space for a clinic number or other number that connects the patient to other facility specific information. List the inventory date and circle or fill in the person who completed the inventory. Then grade each item. The table provides a brief description to help with individual scoring. The first item of the individual scoring guide represents the current status or result. The analysis shows that the single dimension represented by this project has internal consistency. Other analysis shows that this main dimension includes three regions representing capacity activities and social participation. Projects contributing to each region are identified in the three subscale indexes. It is mainly used to represent the sequela. The preceding item of should reflect the current status of the assessed person, regardless of whether there is any situation other than brain injury that leads to limited ability activities or participation. This is because, if it is not impossible, it is usually very difficult to determine which factors of brain injury and other factors are the causes of the current situation. If there are other pre-existing or coexisting conditions that lead to the restrictions in the preceding item, these conditions will be determined in item of the list. If drug treatment is required to achieve normal or near normal functions, it shall be reflected by rating the item as Grade. For example, if the use of stimulant drugs eliminates attention problems, the person will be rated in item.
